<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Direct Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideadesign.ca/the-naked-idea/2008/12/08/direct-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideadesign.ca/the-naked-idea/2008/12/08/direct-response/</link>
	<description>A weekly look at how charities can communicate better with donors through design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:41:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Lepp</title>
		<link>http://www.ideadesign.ca/the-naked-idea/2008/12/08/direct-response/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lepp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideadesign.ca/the-naked-idea/?p=130#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Great points Ted - with a nod to the great truth in direct response - all things are unknown until you test!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points Ted &#8211; with a nod to the great truth in direct response &#8211; all things are unknown until you test!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Grigg</title>
		<link>http://www.ideadesign.ca/the-naked-idea/2008/12/08/direct-response/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Grigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideadesign.ca/the-naked-idea/?p=130#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a thought provoking post.

There appear to be different schools of thought on multichannel marketing.

One is that people show channel preference with their initial response. Others believe in the synergy produced by marketing to the same responders using multiple channels regardless of how they were acquired.

One direct marketing forensic analyst believes that channel use is driven more by zip code (i.e. geodemographics) than age. For example suburbia and exurbia prefer online communications. But urbanites prefer direct mail.

And using email or outbound` telemarketing risks alienating donors or any customer unless permission is given.

I hate getting unsolicited calls from anyone. And I get many phone calls from bogus fundraisers. So I insist on direct mail from such suspect callers. Direct mail seems to weed out the fly by nighters. At least, I get an opportunity to investigate them.

So test into multichannel efforts before assuming that it automatically yields a good return. Treat each donor as an individual. And ask for permission to contact them by phone or email. Otherwise, the relationship could sour before it has a chance to grow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a thought provoking post.</p>
<p>There appear to be different schools of thought on multichannel marketing.</p>
<p>One is that people show channel preference with their initial response. Others believe in the synergy produced by marketing to the same responders using multiple channels regardless of how they were acquired.</p>
<p>One direct marketing forensic analyst believes that channel use is driven more by zip code (i.e. geodemographics) than age. For example suburbia and exurbia prefer online communications. But urbanites prefer direct mail.</p>
<p>And using email or outbound` telemarketing risks alienating donors or any customer unless permission is given.</p>
<p>I hate getting unsolicited calls from anyone. And I get many phone calls from bogus fundraisers. So I insist on direct mail from such suspect callers. Direct mail seems to weed out the fly by nighters. At least, I get an opportunity to investigate them.</p>
<p>So test into multichannel efforts before assuming that it automatically yields a good return. Treat each donor as an individual. And ask for permission to contact them by phone or email. Otherwise, the relationship could sour before it has a chance to grow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.ideadesign.ca/the-naked-idea/2008/12/08/direct-response/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideadesign.ca/the-naked-idea/?p=130#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Thanks Laurie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Laurie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.ideadesign.ca/the-naked-idea/2008/12/08/direct-response/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideadesign.ca/the-naked-idea/?p=130#comment-243</guid>
		<description>My heart stopped too!  Great post, John.  I&#039;d write more, but it would only restate all that you&#039;ve already written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My heart stopped too!  Great post, John.  I&#8217;d write more, but it would only restate all that you&#8217;ve already written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

