Idea Design Home Work Biographies Blog Contact

    A weekly look at how charities can communicate better with donors through design.

Archive for the ‘Testing’ Category

Direct Mail Tip #1

Monday, July 27th, 2009

I’m not actually sure that this is the first time I’ve published a tip about direct mail – but it IS the first time I used a video to do it… This is a quick video showing how you need to think about what you are mailing your donors from the very get go.

What do you have to say?

Monday, June 29th, 2009

I grew up in a very tiny village called Caistorville. In Caistorville, as a youth, if you wanted a job, there were really only three available.

1) You could work at a farm, helping in their fields or barn.

2) You could work at the feed mill, shoving and bagging wheat, feed and lots of other stuff.

3) You could work at the gas station pumping gas and stocking shelves.

For the record I did all three.

I recall many hours spent standing near the front door of the gas station waiting for someone to roll through our sleepy little village to get some gas and listening to the owner, Roger talk religion, politics, social issues, sports and weather with all the locals and occasionally lost soul.

He and one local farmer one time were having a very animated discussion over local politics and I remember as the voices started to raise, I think Roger was looking for a bit of solidarity from this young employee… Looking over the shoulder of the farm he shouts at me “John, what do you think about all this? What do you have to say?”

I looked at him for a moment searching my mind for some sort of insight to their conversation and I found I had none. I shrugged. He made some noise like a snort and continued on with the arguement.

A few minutes later as the farmer turned to leave, he stopped and looked at me and said something I always remember.

“Boy, you’ll always learn more from listening than talking.”

That advice has guided me well through the years.

I remember being in a client meeting where we were suppose to be working with the client to develop some ideas for a new package. This client in particular liked to take advantage of the fact that he was the client and liked to run the show. I think there were 10-12 of us there, my creative director and numerous colleagues all present… And this client spots me sitting at the other end of the table he stops and in a louder than necessary voice says, “So John, you haven’t said a word – what do you have to say?” I considered my words carefully and said, “I’m not sure (client name removed to protect him), but when I think of something valuable to add to the conversation, you can bet I will say so…”

That didn’t go over very well.

I think my creative director respected my approach but pushed me to be more vocal in these meetings. But as I told him, if I’m sitting in a room with people like him who have far more experience than I, and I have nothing at that moment to offer – why should I open my mouth to speak? I assured him there seemed to be enough people doing that already. I was going to learn a lot more by listening than talking…

I’m taking a long time to get to my point which is – as charities, or as people – do we spend more time listening or talking?

Do you listen more to your donors or do you talk more to your donors (or clients or customers)? Do you ask them what they think or do you always tell them what you think?

We all know we feel more important when we are asked for our opinion. It’s a validation that we have something to offer. Ask your donors what they think… Learn from them.

This post also serves reminder to me as a blogger or whatever the heck I am. I was reminded this past weekend, don’t blog if you don’t have anything to say. Don’t blog for the sake of blogging. (But I have a schedule! People expect it!) Don’t talk for the sake of talking.

Add to the conversation when you have something of value to contribute.(Thanks Phil!)

That’s sound advice that we all can learn from.

Typography Part Deux

Sunday, July 20th, 2008

A few posts ago I wrote about a study that the CNIB did with OCAD in Toronto about type and its readability. I was reading a small article in Step Inside Design this past week called Good (Letter) Works. There is a London, England based firm called Fontsmith who created a custom font for Mencap, a British charity for the learning disabled called PS Me.

Here is a bit from the Step Inside Design article:

“We didn’t want to make something patronizing,” says Jason Smith, FontSmith creative director. “We wanted to make something beautiful that was easy to read.” So FontSmith worked with the client… to conduct a series of focus groups. The designers tested existing fonts to see which held the most appeal (Comic Sans?) and explored several in-progress designs, assessing how width, style, letterspacing and other factors affected readability. Ultimately, larger, rounder letters proved more accessible, and Smith hopes the new font, FS Mencap, becomes a standard in uder-friendly fonts, maybe someday rivaling Arial and Helvetica.”

I find this interesting because, like the CNIB study, it finds that a sans serif face is legible and readable. I would challenge any charity to try testing a serif face (ie: Times New Roman) vs a san serif (ie: Arial or Helvetica) in a letter.

If you decide to test it out, please let me know! And if I can convince one of my clients to try it, I’ll report back.

Should the envelope be plain or should it be BOLD?

Monday, July 7th, 2008

I was reading “The Direct Mail Envelope Quandry” at Direct Creative and if I had a nickel for every time I’ve had this argument with someone… Well, I’d probably have a whole lot of nickles.

The problem I have is that it seems all charities want to (or can only afford to) mail are white #10 envelopes – and ‘lets slap some sort of tagline on it’.

I know I’ve said it before – be appropriate. If you have something inside that will be of some use to your donor, tell them, unless it’s something lumpy – then you don’t need to – they’ll open it any way.

Nothing says “I’m junk mail” more than a #10 with a boring tagline on it.

If you can only mail out a #10 – do something interesting with it. Use a different colour stock, use a first class stamp, use a label, make it closed faced, use some handwriting on it, use 2 windows, don’t (gasp) put anything on it… Some of these ideas will work better in prospecting than with your house file or vicea-versa…

As they say over and over – test it. And then test something else.

I don’t know if the envelope should be plain or if it should be bold, but as I’ve said before, if everyone else is letting their donors eat vanilla – send them chocolate.

Speaking of chocolate, I received this envelope the other day – talk about standing out. I had no idea what the American Power Conversion was but I was definitely going to open this thing.

And I promise this will be the last post about #10’s I do for a while!

Next week:

I have a special mid week blog planned. I was invited to be a part of a special Post2Post Book Tour hosted by Idea Sandbox. I will be interviewing the authour of “Jack’s Notebook”, Gregg Fraley.

The tour will be as follows:

Site: Education Innovation by Rob Jacobs – Monday, July 14

The Naked Idea by John Lepp (that’s me!) Tuesday, July 15

Marketing Fresh Peel by Chris Wilson Wednesday, July 16

Innoblog Thursday, July 17

The Brand Chef by Andrew Clark Friday, July 18

Hope you will join me for that.

Typography

Monday, June 23rd, 2008

As a designer and communicator, I love looking at type. If I had to choose between visiting a BMW showroom and caressing the curves of their latest vehicle or going online and oogling the most recent releases of type from the foundaries, I would choose option 2 every time.

Typography can be very human. It can be boring or expressive, slim or over weight, quiet or loud, sensual or rigid, male or female… I think you get the point. Knowing these things, and knowing the sorts of visual clues to look for when you are looking at type, helps you correctly identify which type face would be the best for whatever you are doing.

I was reading a post over at The Happy Donor about Type and Layout Tricks. Dan Shaw discusses some of the finer points of one of my favourite books, “Type & Layout: Are You Communicating or Just Making Pretty Shapes” by Colin Wheildon.

We almost all know that letters should be set in serif type, like a Times New Roman and headlines should be set in a sans serif, like a Verdana or Helvetica. But are we sure?

I have tried to convince a few charities to test that. Usually with little success. “What would be the point of that? We all know serif is the GOLDEN rule!”

First things first – test it. You might be surprised what your donors like. Maybe it will be serif, maybe not. Test doing a large print version (ala Readers Digest) of your letter. Try using different fonts.

Test, test, test and you will learn, learn, learn!!!

I will leave you with this. A few years ago, the CNIB (Canadian Institute for the Blind) teamed up with The Ontario College of Art and Design to do a little more current research into how we read type, what works and what doesn’t. You can download a copy of their findings by clicking here if you want. But to nutshell it for you, they found that typefaces like Verdana and Arial can be more readable than a Times New Roman. And for people with low vision require at least a 16pt to 18pt type size for maximum readablilty.

When was the last time you mailed a letter using a 16pt Helvetica to your donors? Never? I suggest you take a look at the report and then test, test, test… your donors will thank you for it.

A week of mail…

Monday, June 9th, 2008

For those of you who visit, I have mentioned my mother-in-law before. She is very much a typical Canadian donor – the target audience of almost every direct mail package produced. Every time she comes for a visit, she brings me her stack of mail which I eagerly tear through learning all sorts of things… Take a look at a week of mail…

This display is a bit different in that there are only a dozen white #10’s. Usually they are almost all white #10’s. I’ve also learned that Covenant House is on to something. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a white #10 package from them.

Steve Thomas always said you know something is working if you will see it again and again. So I would have to make an educated guess that Covenant House knows that if they produce anything EXCEPT for a white #10 envelope package, their results will be pretty good.

The other ‘learning’ here is really how much the mail all looks the same. Logo in left corner, address window, indicia, tagline…

A golden rule of marketing is in order to stand out from the competition, is to do the opposite of what they are. And in our market right now, it is safe to say the majority of charities are all mailing white #10’s all year long.

So here’s a free tip: Don’t!